Here is my sermon from Sunday. The text was Luke 24:13-35:
In
the Protestant tradition, we have two things which we consider to be
sacraments, baptism and communion. This stands in contrast to the seven
sacraments in the Roman Catholic and the Orthodox traditions. During the
protestant reformation, the seven were narrowed down to two because these are
both things that Jesus commanded that we do and also things in which Jesus also
participated. And what we see in scripture is that the early church continued
and participated in both of these things from the earliest days, and so in
today’s scripture readings we find both of them, or at least a form of them,
taking place. The first is Peter’s call to baptism in which 3000 people are
baptized, which makes me think about the logistics of baptizing 3000 people in
one day, and while we never are actually told that the disciples are ever
baptized, we presume that they were, maybe by John the Baptist, or perhaps by
Jesus, but this becomes an important and identifying aspect of the early church
that obviously continues through to today. And then we have Jesus implement the
practice of communion on his last night with the disciples, which we know from
the writings of Paul continued to be a significant act in the early church, and
we have at least a part of a communion meal in today’s passage from Luke.
Even
though we are now several weeks past Easter, in today’s passage we find
ourselves back on Easter morning, with two followers of Jesus who are traveling
out to the town of Emmaus which is said to be some seven miles from Jerusalem,
although some manuscript traditions say 19 miles, although where the town is,
is unknown because there is no record of a town by that name, although there is
much speculation of where it might have been. But, it’s entirely possible, and
we’ll return to this idea, that we’re not supposed to know, that it’s supposed
to be sort of any town, a generic town, one that is meant to represent our
town, or a place where we can put ourselves in the role of making this journey.
But regardless of where it is, on Easter morning, they have heard that Jesus’
body was not there, and that the women, or at the very least Mary, have
encountered the risen Christ, but, like the other disciples, they don’t appear
to believe it yet. They’ve heard it but have not processed it, have not
accepted it, it has not taken root in their hearts and mind. And so, they set
out going home and as they are making their way, they are discussing the
events, although the Greek word used here could also be translated as arguing, when
Jesus appears before them. Except, like in other versions of the resurrection
story, they don’t know that it is Jesus.
We
are told that their eyes were kept from recognizing him. But it’s not clear
why. Is it Jesus who is stopping them from seeing him? Or, is it their own
non-belief that keeps them from recognizing who he is? Is it because they have not
accepted the resurrection so they are therefore unable to see Jesus? They
cannot see what is happening right before their own eyes. It’s not that God has
blinded them, but that they have blinded themselves. And so, when Jesus appears
and asks them what they are talking about, the begin to tell him the story of
what has happened, or at least what they have heard about what has happened,
and here is where we get the first substantial shift in the story. The two
disciples think they know what’s going on and are going to inform this poor
ignorant traveler, who, as they say is the only person who doesn’t know what
has taken place. But it turns out, as it often does that those who spout on
about how much they know, in fact know very little, because Jesus then begins
to expand upon what Moses and all the prophets had said and to interpret it all
for them, so that, perhaps, they will no longer be “foolish” and slow of heart
to believe. Now, you might think that this instruction would be enough for them
to figure out that something unique is going on, but they don’t. Their eyes are
still kept from recognizing Jesus.
But
as the approach the town, Jesus walks before them as if he is going to keep
walking, but the disciples urge him to stay with them that evening, an act of
hospitality, and when they then sit down to eat, Jesus takes the bread, blesses
it, breaks it and gives it to them, just as he had done earlier with the
disciples, and in the breaking of the bread their eyes are opened and they
recognize Jesus just as he vanishes from the house. They then quickly return to
Jerusalem to inform the eleven what has happened to them.
But
what is striking is that it is in the breaking of the bread that they recognize
Christ, that they see that Christ has been with them the entire time, and come
to know the resurrection as reality. As Christians, we practice and live an
embodied faith. That is we are not talking about beliefs or ideas, although we
do that, but we worship a God who became human and we practice acts as central
to our faith that are rooted in our lives. We baptize with water, we break
bread and take a cup. These are not complex and rare items, but the items of
ordinary life, and yet these are tangible and visible ways that we come to know
and see God. They are concrete ways that we come to experience God, and are
called to experience God. One of the reasons why we practice an open communion
table, not limiting it to anyone, is because we believe that communion can be a
converting sacrament. That is receiving the bread and wine that people can come
to know and accept Jesus Christ. That just like at the end of the walk to
Emmaus that people can recognize Jesus in the breaking of the bread. That Jesus
is present in these elements just as much for us as he was when he gave it to
the disciples on that first night, and just as present as he was for the two on
that first Easter. That Christ is embodied in these elements, whether you
believe that the bread and the juice become the literal blood and body of
Christ or whether you believe that it is merely a spiritual presence, we agree
that Christ is here in this moment.
But,
Christianity is also embodied in that Jesus doesn’t just tell us to love one
another, he gets down on his knees in service to wash the disciples’ feet, and
calls us to do the same. It’s not just saying what we believe, but actually
living it out in our lives. The two disciples have the opportunity to break
bread with Jesus only because they invite Jesus to come and stay with them.
They offer up hospitality and a meal. There is something significant about
breaking bread with a person, literally and metaphorically. It fundamentally
changes the relationship, and so it’s this act of hospitality that is the sign
act of allowing their eyes to be opened to Christ’s presence with them. We say that the sacraments are outward of
visible signs of an inward and spiritual grace that takes place in us. So too
are the embodied acts that we do as Christians signs of the inward
transformation that has taken place within us in our walk of faith. If the
disciples had not embodied their faith by offering hospitality, they would not
have encountered the risen Christ. As James, the brother of Jesus, writes “Show
me your faith apart from your works, and I by my works will show you my faith.”
And in that, I also think that we are called to embody this story.
We
are told that one of the disciples is named Cleopas, who only appears in this
story, but the second disciple remains unnamed. Sharon Ringe who is a New
Testament scholar who has written about women in Luke’s gospel and in his Acts
of the Apostles has speculated that the second disciple is not named because
she is a woman. She has evidence to
support this argument and I mention it here because we should be cognizant of
the subordinate role that women played in the ancient world and how that found
its way into scripture and the work of the church, and thus shouldn’t dismiss
this argument outright or without consideration. But others speculate that
perhaps the other disciple is not named so that we could put ourselves into the
story. Just as perhaps there was no place named Emmaus so that we could see it
as our destination, and we could be the second disciple on that journey. This
unnamed disciple is just as involved in the story and its movement as Cleopas
is, it’s not a secondary role, so perhaps it’s an insert your name here moment.
That we are to put ourselves in the place of this story as we hear the Easter
story, to see ourselves wondering if it’s true, of walking this journey of
faith, discussing it with others, and being given the opportunity to practice
our faith at the same time, including providing witness to our faith to others
who we meet on the way.
But
the final piece to remember from this story is that while there are times in
our lives when most of us have had God moments and we have known it in that
moment, for the most part, we tend to see our religious experiences, our God
moments, only in retrospect. That we become like the disciples and say,
“weren’t our hearts burning within us” be we didn’t really realize it at the
moment. There are times when we desperately want God to be present for us, and
we think if God is not that we must be totally alone, but what we see in this
story is that God can be present without us knowing it because our eyes have
been closed. We don’t see it in the moment and only later realize God was there
all along. Sometimes that’s just the way it is, but there is also a call in
this story to look for those God moments in our lives. To look for where you
are seeing God moving through others, because that’s often or maybe even
usually how it happens, but also to pay attention to how God is using you. When
the disciples return to Jerusalem, Jesus uses them to also make an Easter
proclamation to reaffirm their story. So, in this coming week, and month, and
year, I encourage you to intentionally look for where God is moving in your
life, or where God has moved, and then write those moments down. Keep track of
them, and I can guarantee you, you will be surprised at how often it happens,
and then you will be better prepared to see, as scripture says, of the times we
might be entertaining angels unaware.
In
addition, to see God’s movement in our lives also involves moving through life
with the expectation that God will be involved, to be in prayer for that
movement and live in anticipation for how and where God’s presence will be
felt, where our lives will be changed, and where in the breaking of bread that
our eyes will be opened to seeing the risen Christ present and walking this
journey of faith with us. I pray that it will be so my brothers and sisters.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment