Here is my sermon from Sunday. The text was Mark 13:1-10, 12-13, 24-26, 32, 35-37:
If
you are to email NASA with a scientific question, it is likely to be answered
by Dr. David Morrison, who holds a Ph.D. in astronomy from Harvard, and that’s
only important because I don’t think that Harvard gets enough attention for
being a good school. But, according to Dr. Morrison, he spends a minimum of one
hour every day answering people’s questions about the end of times, or at least
the end of the world as we know it. We seem to be obsessed with this idea, but
it’s not really anything new. We find similar things in the Hebrew scriptures,
and the New Testament is full of discussion, as well as speculation within
writings about when such things were going to happen. Clement, an early bishop
of Rome, said the end would happen in the year 90. Hilary of Potiers said it
would be in 365. His more famous student Martin of Tours said the year 400. The
German emperor Otis III thought that an eclipse in 968 would be the harbinger,
and Pope Innocent III said 1284. The Shakers said 1792, and Charles Wesley, the
co-founder of Methodism preferred 1794, although he was already dead 6 years by
that time. For Jehovah’s witnesses it was 1914, also1918, 1941 and 1975, to
name just a few and for Hal Lindsey and Pat Robertson the end was coming in
1980, or 1982, 1985, 1988 and then 2007, and of course there have been many
more failed predictions since then. And what do they all have in common? First,
they were wrong, and second, according to Jesus, they never should have been
making predictions at all, and in doing so were only serving as false prophet’s
intent on leading people astray, and so we need to stop listening to such end
of time mongers telling us they have insider knowledge, because Jesus says they
are all wrong, and we’ll get back to that.
The
selection of passages we heard from Mark today come from the 13th
chapter which is known as Mark’s Little Apocalypse. Now typically, when we hear
the word apocalypse, we think it means talk about the end of the world, and so
we talk about apocalyptic or post-apocalyptic movies, like Mad Max as an
example. But the word itself has nothing to do with the end of times. instead
it simply means an unveiling or revealing, so that some divine knowledge is
being revealed. The apocalypse with which most of us are familiar, is of course
the apocalypse of John, which is also known as Revelation, and is the only full-blown
apocalypse we have in scripture. But we have other types of apocalyptic pieces
found in the book of Daniel, which is the other best scriptural example, but
also to be found in Joel and Isaiah and Amos and Zephaniah, who all talk about
the end of time.
Now
technically, the word for that is eschatology, that is the study of the end of
time, and if we are talking about specifically the second coming of Christ, that
is known as the Parousia. I tell you that not only to justify my seminar
education, but also because it’s important to know what it is that we are
talking about. Because one of the most popular apocalypses in the early church
was the Apocalypse of Peter, which was included in the earlies known list of
accepted books for the church, known as the Muratorian Canon, but it has
nothing to do with eschatology, but instead Peter, although it was composed
decades after Peter’s death, is given a guided tour of heaven and hell, think
Dante’s inferno. But it was an apocalypse because it sought to “explain, earthly realities through
visions of heavenly truths.” Now one of the problems we have with apocalyptic
literature is that it is not something with which we are familiar, and so we
miss the pieces that people originally would have originally understood.
The best example I came up with this week was
that I rewatched the movie Clueless
last week, and in it Alicia Silverstone, who plays the main character, says
about something that it’s like searching for meaning in a Pauly Shore movie.
Now for more daughters they have no idea who Pauly Shore is, as I’m also
guessing is true for many of you, and so that has lost all context for us. The
same is true for lots of apocalyptic literature. That doesn’t mean we cannot
figure it out, after all you could look up Pauly Shore, and even watch his
movies, although I wouldn’t recommend it, and thereby come to some
understanding. But, we are not going to spend time today trying to interpret
Jesus’ meaning here, but instead we are going to focus on why Jesus is talking
this way at all and what it means for our call to discipleship.
And
that starts with where this discourse takes place, and that is that Jesus and
the disciples have left the Temple, which at the time was regarded as one of
the great buildings of the Roman Empire, which was Herod’s intention when he
remodeled it, and so the disciples are rightfully marveling at it’s size, and
the size of the stones with which it was constructed. You can see from this
picture that the stones used in the Temple were huge, but the disciples are
focused on the wrong things.
In Last week’s passage, Jesus rebukes Peter
because, he says, Peter is focused on the things of man, rather than the things
of God. Here too, even though the Temple
is said to be the home of God, they are focused on the outward appearances of
the kingdom of man, not appropriately on the kingdom of God, and so Jesus tells
them not to put their trust in the things of the world because they will all
come to an end. Don’t put your treasure in things here on earth where moth and
rust will consume them, instead store up treasures in heaven Jesus says. Now
there is a more specific prophetic claim about the destruction of the Temple
also being made here, which clearly has a history in Israelite history, as well
as at the time that Mark is writing his gospel the Temple is either under siege
by the Romans, or has just recently been destroyed by the Romans, and so they
initial hearers and readers of Mark are experiencing the very thing that Jesus
is talking about. But the disciples ask Jesus when this will happen, what will
be the sign? Now this is a common request of Jesus, to show them a sign, and
what is Jesus’ answer when people demand a sign? He tells them no sign will be
given.
And
yet, he does then say to them, “When
you hear of wars and rumors of wars, do not be alarmed; this must take place,
but the end is still to come. For nation will rise against nation, and
kingdom against kingdom; there will be earthquakes in various places; there
will be famines.” Now, since the time that Jesus said this, and Mark wrote it
down, has there ever been a time when these things haven’t been taking place?
No, and Jesus does not say that this marks the end, but instead he says that
this is but the beginning of the birth pangs.
Now
this week, is Samantha’s birthday, but when Linda’s labor began did it mean
that Sam was gone to be born immediately? No. it was going to take a while. I
read this week, and it came from a Reuters report not from the National
Enquirer, that the longest labor on record was 75 days. A woman in Poland went
into labor in the fifth month, and delivered one of triplets prematurely, and
then doctors were able to stop the delivery of the other two, and she spent the
next 75 days laying in bed with her feet higher than her head. But, the
beginning of the labor is just the start, and it also means that things will
get worse before they get better. And so, Jesus tells them that they are going
to undergo suffering, that families will be broken apart, that betrayal will
happen, and what is the message? Endure. Remain faithful, and “the one who
endures to the end will be saved.” If you endure, good things will happen,
because what Jesus is telling us, what apocalyptic literature tells us, is that
we know how it all ends. Suffering, pain and evil will not be the last word –
the one who stands at the end of history is the same who stood at the beginning
of history, and, Jesus says, “the elect will be gathered” in and welcomed home.
Now
the typical apocalyptic eschatology looks like this: It’s the already and the
not quite yet. God has already intervened in the world through Christ to bring
restoration and the kingdom, but it’s also not quite here yet. The Kingdom of
God has come near, but it is not fully realized. We live in this in-between
time, and so we see the signs of the times, but they only tell us that the
labor pains have begun, not when the new age will be realized. So, what are we
to do? First, we are to remain faithful, and to continue to proclaim the good
news, despite everything that is happening, and that good news is not to try
and work to bring about the end, especially through the acts of violence, or to
listen to the promise that armed struggle will put an end to the old order. WWI
was said to be the war to end all wars. Did it? Second, we are not to worry about when things
might be completed, because even the son and the angels don’t know when that
will happen, so don’t worry about it, and don’t listen to what anyone else says
when they claim they do know, because they are wrong. Third, do the job that
you were called to do, remain faithful and stay vigilant and stay awake. This
has precursor to the passion story, because what do the disciples do when they
go to the Garden of Gethsemane, even when Jesus tells them to stay awake? They
fall asleep. Again, in Mark’s gospel the disciples don’t get it, and so the
message is, and this comes to a conclusion next week, don’t be like the
disciples. Don’t follow or listen to others, listen and follow Jesus. And the
fourth point is to have hope because even in the midst of pain and suffering,
turmoil and tragedy, we know how it all will end.
A
story is told of a meeting of state legislators in colonial New England, that
descended into darkness because of an unpredicted solar eclipse. Some people
panicked and called for an adjournment of the meeting. Then one of them said,
“Mr. Speaker, if it is not the end of the world and we adjourn, we shall appear
to be fools. If it is the end of the world, I should choose to be found doing
my duty. I move you sir, that candles be brought in.” I think that means, and I
think what Jesus is telling us, is to be focused on things that we can control.
We cannot control how people will respond to us, how we will be treated, but we
are warned that when we work for the Kingdom and seek to live into the Kingdom
that there will be costs. And notice in this passage that it is both the
religious, in bring brought into synagogues, and also the government, in being
brought before councils, who are persecuting followers of Jesus, because power
is power, regardless of who is wielding it, and the call to the new age, where
the last shall be first and the first shall be last, is a threat. But stand
firm, Jesus urges us, and hold tight to the faith and cling to hope, because
this is but the beginning of the birth pains, and they could last a while. And
yet, what happens when the birth pains end? A new baby is there, a new hope is
born. I’ve read that in France, when a woman becomes pregnant, people will
great her with the saying “I congratulate you on your hope.” It’s not yet hope
fulfilled, but it’s hope promised. That is true for us as well, it is hope that
we hang on to, and it is what we celebrate in the sacrament of baptism, of
dying and being reborn as children of God, and in the sacrament of communion.
We
celebrate and remember both the acts of the past, of Jesus’ suffering, death
and resurrection, of the present in gathering together as one body in Christ to
celebrate, and to gather with all the saints who have gone before, and we
celebrate the world to come in which we shall feast at God’s heavenly banquet,
and about that time, no one knows but the father. It could be in ten minutes or
ten days or ten thousand days, but here is what I do know, and that is that someday
we will all meet God face to face, and we hope to hear God say “well done my
good and faithful servant,” but to do that we have to keep watch by being
faithful and we have to stay awake by doing the job that we are called to do,
which is to proclaim the good news, not just with what we say, but more
importantly by what we do, or to answer the old question, “If you were to be
put on trial for being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict
you?” I pray that it will be so my brothers and sisters. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment