Here is my sermon from Sunday. Part four in our series on the people of the passion. The text was Luke 22:1-6, 14-16, 21-27, 47-53:
In one of the most dramatic scenes in theater, Julius Caesar
is attacked by those conspiring against him, including his beloved friend
Brutus, and Caesar utters the words that have echoed down to us since the day
that Shakespeare first wrote them, “et tu, Brute?” Then Caesar says words that are just as
important, but not as well known, “then fall, Caesar.” That might be one of the most famous scenes of
betrayal in history, except, of course, for the one we just heard between Jesus
and Judas, but I have to be honest and say that I think that Judas might be one
of the most tragic and misunderstood characters of history, maybe especially in
Judas’ understanding of himself.
Often in the New Testament, people’s names will tell us something about who
they are. While there are several
Judases in the gospels, including another disciple, the Judas we are focusing
on today is referred to as Judas Iscariot, or Judas of Iscariot, Judas the one
called Iscariot, among several others, not only so we can tell him apart from
the other Judases, but also to give us some information, but the problem is we
don’t really know what that means. The
answer you are most likely to find is that Iscariot may mean “man of Kerioth”,
a town recorded in the book of Joshua as being in southern Israel, but there
are some problems with this identification.
The first is that there is no indication that the town of Kerioth still
existed 1200 years after Joshua mentions it, as there is no record of it during
the time of Jesus. The other problem is that all of the other disciples’ were
from Galilee, where Jesus is from, so what would someone from southern Judea be
doing up in Galilee? Does that mean it’s
impossible, of course not, and if it that is true, it would mean that Judas was
different and separate from the other disciples from the very beginning.
Some scholars have speculated that Iscariot may mean that Judas
was a member of a group of zealots called the sicarrii. We know that at least one other disciple,
Simon, but not Simon Peter, was called a zealot, but the sicarrii were a
special group who assassinated other Jews whom they saw as collaborators with
the Romans, including the high priest Jonathan, using hidden knives, from where
they get their name. Another option is
that Iscariot comes from an Aramaic word meaning “red color,” so maybe Judas
was a red head, and we all know about red heads. In the end, where most scholars who have
worked on this issue end up, is that while they may have their personal
preference, the truth is that we simply don’t know what the term Iscariot means
and it may even be that 40 plus years after the facts that even the writers of
the gospels no longer knew what it meant either.
