Here is my sermon from Sunday. The text was Luke 16:19-31:
“Ladies and gentleman, greed -- for lack of a better word -- is good.
Greed is right. Greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the
essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms -- greed for
life, for money, for love, knowledge -- has marked the upward surge of mankind.
And greed -- you mark my words -- will not only save Teldar Paper, but that
other malfunctioning corporation called the USA.” Most of you probably
recognize that speech by Michael Douglas from the 1987 movie Wall Street. What
might be less known is that the speech was not really the creation of the
screen writer of the film, but instead came from the person on whom Douglas’
character was based, Ivan Boesky. Speaking at the graduation ceremony for the
business school at the University of California at Berkley, Boesky said, “Greed
is alright, by the way. I want you to know that. I think greed is healthy. You
can be greedy and still feel good about yourself.” That was just a few months
before he would be arrested by the SEC for insider trading to which he would
plead guilty to one charge and pay a then record individual fine of $100
million. But before all that happened, he turned against his former compatriots
and while collecting information against them for the SEC was allowed to
continue doing insider trading making millions in profits until the SEC had
enough information to also indict Michael Milken who was then forced to pay
what is still the record individual penalty of $600 million. In response to the
actions of wall street in the 80’s, congress passed a law that called for life
in prison for certain financial crimes, and if you are wondering how many
bankers or wall street execs have been subject to that penalty, the answer is
less than one. Who says that crime doesn’t pay, and that greed is not good?
Or at least that’s what we’re told, and at the very least shown. Make
as much money as you can, buy as much stuff as you can, exercise or gain as
much power as you can. If you are rich, you are good. If you are poor, you are
bad. And of course we all know that if we make lots of money and drive the
right car and live in the right house and even drink the right beer then we’ll
all be happy and will attract the most beautiful member of the opposite sex
right? And if you can’t actually afford to live that lifestyle, it’s still all
attainable, just buy it all on credit, because no one really knows how much
money you’re worth and so if you can show how successful you are through how
much stuff you have, how much gold you own, then surely you have to be successful
because we do indeed judge people not on who they are, but how much they make
and what they own, and unfortunately we judge ourselves the same way. We think
our salaries, or lack thereof, are a reflection of who we are and what we are,
and there is the crux of the problem of greed, the deadly sin we are looking at
today in comparison to Jesus injunction that the merciful are blessed and that
they will receive mercy.
Greed is not about making money or even about having money, because you
can be extremely poor and still be greedy and be extremely rich and not necessarily
be greedy. Money, or the other things we may be greedy about, in and of
themselves have no value. It’s the value and meaning that we give to them that
makes all the difference. Although we
routinely hear that money is the root of all evil, the scriptural passage,
which we heard this morning from 1 Timothy, actually says “the love of money is
a root of all kinds of evil.” It’s about where we place our trust and
allegiance, do we trust in God or do we trust in money and stuff. While Jesus’
clearly says that money is a problem, he does not say that it is a sin, but our
relationship with it. When the rich man asks what he must do to inherit eternal
life, Jesus tells him to sell everything he has and give it to the poor. But,
we are told the man goes away sad because he has many possessions, and then we
hear Jesus say “It’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle
then it is for a rich person to get into the Kingdom of God.”
Rev. Stacey Simpson, a Baptist minister from Georgia, recalls encountering
this scripture for the first time while reading in bed when she was seven years
old. She says that she became so alarmed that she slammed the Bible shut,
jumped out of bed and ran down the hall to her parents’ room, where she
awakened her mother out of a sound sleep. “Mom,” she whispered urgently,
“Jesus says that rich people don’t go to heaven!” Her mother’s response
was brief and to the point: “We are not rich. Go back to bed.” Of course
that’s the trap we fall into isn’t it, that we’re not rich, and we’re certainly
not greedy. It’s those other people that Jesus is talking about. He’s not
talking about us.
Even Matthew does this because when we compare Jesus’ statements
between Matthew and Luke we see some stark contrasts. In Luke’s version of the
beatitudes, Jesus says “blessed are the poor” and “blessed are those who hunger
and thirst.” Those are economic statements which go hand in hand with the story
of Jesus that Luke tells. Matthew, on the other hand, spiritualizes them to
“blessed are the poor in spirit” and “blessed are those who hunger and thirst
for righteousness.” Now it’s believed that Matthew and Luke are writing to two
different communities when it comes to economic realities, that Luke’s
community are people who are truly concerned about where their daily bread will
come from, and for them hearing that they are blessed and are receiving God’s
favor in their poverty is comforting and provides hope. Whereas Matthew’s
community is better off financially, and so Matthew has changed the language to
soften the blow and make it a little easier for them to hear and accept.
We want to think we’re not rich, that these things don’t apply to us,
but I have some good news and some bad news. The bad news is that all of us are
rich. We are definitely rich by the standards of Jesus’ time and we are even
rich by the standards of today when we compare ourselves not to each other, but
to the world. But here is the good news. Possessions and wealth in and of
themselves are not a problem, but it’s our relationship to them and with them
and what we choose to do with them that gets us into trouble.
The parable we heard from today, known as Lazarus and the rich man, is
indicative of this, because if you notice, we are never told anything negative
about the man. We are not told that he is bad or evil. All that we are told is
that he is rich and that he is dressed in purple and fine linen, a sign not
only of wealth but also of power and privilege since the roman empire had rules
about who could wear purple and how much could be worn by who, and that he
feasts sumptuously each day. This is conspicuous consumption at its most
conspicuous. And, we are also told that he has a gate, that is that he has shut
himself off from the outside world. We might say that he is using his money to
protect him from the cares and concerns of the world, and one of them is lying
right at his own gate. Lazarus, a beggar, and the only person ever named in any
of Jesus’ parables, which should tell us something right at the start about
importance. And for those who may remember
the rich man being named as Dives, that’s simply a misattribution and dives is
the Latin word for rich. But Lazarus is at the gate begging for food. In the ancient world, at a feast, diners
would use bread to wipe the grease from their hands which would then be thrown
under the table, so when they are talking about the food that would drop from
the table, this is probably what is being referred to. It’s so bad and Lazarus
is in such bad shape, that the dogs would even lick Lazarus’ sores, not a
pretty picture, but then they both die.
We are then told that the rich man is being tormented in Hades, and he
calls out to Abraham and tells him to send Lazarus to dip his finger in water
to cool his tongue. Now there are several things striking about this scene. The
first is that he knows Lazarus’ name, which presumably means that he knew
Lazarus when he was laying at his gate, he is not just some stranger. But the
more important piece is that he believes that he has the authority not only to
demand that Lazarus serve him, but to even sort of make the same demand of
Abraham. And not only does he think that he can have Lazarus’ serve him, but
that he can also use Lazarus’ to serve others by delivering a warning to his
brothers. That certainly gives us an indication of how the rich man thinks
about Lazarus, and perhaps all those who he thinks are below him. He believes
that because he is rich that he is better than others, that he can control them
and do whatever he wants to them and with them, one of the great dangers of
wealth and possessions. But for today’s message the most important thing is
what he says to Abraham, and that is “have mercy on me.” He is suffering and so
wants and needs mercy to alleviate his situation, the very thing that Lazarus
himself was seeking at the man’s gate, although it was not verbalized as such.
Now what makes the beatitude about the merciful significant, or
different, is the fact that it is reflexive. Those who give mercy will receive
mercy. In the other beatitudes, people receive things that are different from
what they give, but in this one it’s the same. If you give mercy you will
receive mercy. It’s sort of like Jesus’ claim that to receive forgiveness, you
must also give forgiveness. The rich man wants to receive mercy, but there is
no evidence that he ever gave mercy and so it is not there for him to receive.
The Greek word for mercy, also has the connotation of pouring out, like oil
being poured out of a pitcher, or we might see it as pouring ourselves out for
others. That mercy, or to be merciful, involves giving of ourselves, giving of
our things, giving of our honor and status, even giving of our lives to someone
else who is in need, someone who needs mercy, and that is the opposite of
greed. Greed is about holding onto or seeking to obtain not just what we might
need, but more than what we need, and a sense that there is never enough. And
in seeking to acquire more and more, we also have to hold on to it, not ever
losing it, and certainly not being able to give anything to anyone else,
because then we might never have enough. It becomes an endless game and rather
than us controlling our things, our things control us. In scripture if someone has a demon in them
they are said to be possessed, but what is it that we call things we own but
possessions. And so it often turns out that we don’t control our possessions but
instead that they in fact possess us. Our possessions possess us, and their
place in our lives far outweighs their true importance.
In the last forty years the average home has nearly doubled in size,
and yet one of the fastest growing real estate markets is for self-storage
units. In other words, we have more space to house all our things and yet we
need even more space beyond that to hold all the stuff that won’t fit in the homes.
But is any of this bringing any more happiness to us, or more enjoyment to our
lives? Does it make us more fulfilled? Does it make us better people? Does it
make us any more merciful? The problem that we all find, although few truly
know how to fix, is the fact that the more we pursue happiness through our
stuff, through greed, whether it’s for more money, more possessions, more clothes,
more cars, more vacations, more knowledge, more conquests, more power, more anything,
it’s the accumulation of things, and dedicating our lives to the pursuit of
such things, which is idolatry, and comes with the reality that the more we
seek these things the less satisfaction we get from them. Thus having to pursue even more and more,
conversely ruining the pleasure and happiness we expect to gain from them. What
greed does is to confuse for us the difference between means and ends. While
money, or other things, can be a means to and achieve the ends we desire, including
the practice of mercy; it is when we make them the end in and of themselves
that becomes the problem.
In passage with which must of us are familiar, we hear in the 23rd
psalm “the Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want.” But, other translations tell
us that “the Lord is my shepherd, I have all that I need,” or that “I lack
nothing.” Perhaps I’m wrong on this, but for me there is a big difference
between saying I shall not want and I have all that I need. The first has a
connotation of fighting urges to get more, of having to say to yourself when
you go to the store, “I want that, but I know I’m not supposed to, and so I’m
not getting it.” There is a negative associated with it, a denial, and when we
have to try and deny ourselves something we are more likely to fail, which is
why dieting so rarely works. But instead when we say “I have all that I need”
or “I lack nothing,” then we are not denying ourselves anything because we’ve
take a position not of scarcity, but of abundance, that we have what we already
need, we don’t need to continue to get more and more and more. You can be
wealthy and generous and merciful, and you can be poor and greedy, just as you
can be rich and greedy, and poor and generous and merciful, although it tends
to be the poorest who give the most to charity. Jesus’ addresses this story of
Lazarus to those “who love money,” and then he says that this is an abomination
in the eyes of God. Funny that we don’t hear about this abomination being
talked about very much, just as we don’t hear Jesus’ injunction, quoting from
the prophet Hosea, that God does not desire sacrifice and burn-offerings, or we
might hear that as right religious practice, but that instead God desires mercy
and unconditional love.
I have here a $20 bill, who would like it? What about if I wrinkle it
all up, and wad it up, do you still want it? What about if I step all over it
and get it all dirty, do you still want it? What about if I tear it in half, do
you still want it? Funny that we still want this because of the value that we
have assigned to it, even though it’s just a piece of paper with green ink. But
what do we do with people who have been stepped all over, who are dirty, who
have been bent down and torn, beaten up and bruised by life, and who feel
thrown away, un-valuable, unwanted and unloved? The rich man is not tormented
because he was rich, he is tormented because he did not show mercy, he did not
show compassion, he did not show generosity, he would willing pick up dirty
money, but stepped over the dirty man at his gate, and maybe, just for fun, he
said “get a job.” God sees this as a piece of paper, potentially useful in
helping to bring about kingdom issues, but that life is not about this. Life is
about people, about living in right relationship, about valuing each other not
by what we have, but by who we are which is beloved children of God.
When we hear this parable, I believe we are not to see ourselves in
either the role of the rich man or of Lazarus, instead we should see ourselves
in the role of the brothers that the man wants Lazarus to go warn. We should
hear Abraham saying to us “if they do not listen to Moses and the prophets,
neither will they be convinced even is someone rises from the dead.” Of course
we have testimony to us of someone who was raised from the dead, who when asked
what was the greatest commandment, and we keep coming back to this, and he said
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul,
and with all your mind.” This is the greatest and first commandment. And
a second is like it: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” And then
he concluded by saying, “On these two commandments hang all the law and the
prophets.” Love your God and put your trust in him, and love your neighbor and
treat them as you want to be treated, that is Moses and the prophets. Blessed
are the merciful, my brothers and sisters, for they will be shown mercy, mercy
here and mercy at the judgment for God’s mercy will endure forever. I pray that
it will be so. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment