Here is my sermon from Sunday. The text was Ruth 1:1-17:
The first attempts to create a day
for mothers was begun by Julia Ward Howe, best known for writing the Battle
Hymn of the Republic. It wasn’t a day to
honor mothers the way we do today, but instead in the wake of the civil war, in
which so many mothers had lost their children, it was a day for mothers to come
together to call for peace and disarmament.
The first Mother’s Day as we know it was celebrated at Andrews Methodist
Episcopal Church, the precursor to the United Methodist Church, in 1908. Anna Jarvis wanted to create a day to honor
her mother, who worked promoting female education, and through her to honor all
mothers. At the 1912 general Conference,
which is the administrative body of the Methodist church, they called for
Mother’s Day to be celebrated at all Methodist churches, and in 1914 President
Woodrow Wilson declared the first national celebration as a day to recognize
all the women who had lost sons in war, which we should note is the same year
world war 1 began. Unfortunately for
Jarvis, by the 1920’s she believed that the holiday had become so
commercialized that she began to regret having created the holiday.
I think that Mother’s Day is one of
the hardest sermons to deliver every year.
While Mother’s Day tends to be a high attendace day as people come out
to celebrate their mothers, I also know that there are people who consciously
avoid church on Mother’s Day, or at least dread coming, because they don’t want
to have to deal with the pain that mother’s day brings. There are those women who wanted to have
children but were unable to; there are women who chose not to have children,
and who feel judged for that decision, especially in the church; there are who
have lost children; there are those who have lost their mothers; and there are
those who mothers were unwilling or unable to be a mother to be their children
and somehow I have to bring those altogether and or at least recognize those
realities, to mourn and to celebrate, to recognize pain and to honor, and I
think to proclaim a message of hope, love and appreciation, and I think that
Naomi and Ruth do all those things.
The Book of Ruth is one of only two
books in our Bible named after a woman, does anyone remember the second? (Esther)
The book begins with a key indicator of what the story is going to be
about, but it is very subtle and so to catch it you would have to be very aware
of Biblical storytelling, and that is that we are told that the family are
Ephrathites. It is said that Bethlehem, was
founded by the descendants of Ephrath, who was the wife of Caleb, and so the
family is identified not by a male clan name but by a female name indicating
that this is a story about women and the descendants of those women. There is also a sort of ironic meaning to
this usage as well, as the word Ephrath comes from a root word which means
fertile or productive, and at the moment neither the land nor the sons are
matching that description, and so they have to leave Bethlehem, which means
house of bread, although eventually there is not only fertility in the land but
also fertility in the family as well as Ruth will give birth to a son.
