This was my message for Pentecost Sunday. The text was Acts 2:1-21:
I have to say that I think Peter’s response in the Pentecost story that
the disciples are not drunk as some suppose, because it’s only 9 am is one of
my favorite lines of scripture. The way he says it, means we could possibly see
him saying, “now if it was three or four, maybe” and thank goodness no one had
yet come up with the phrase “it’s five o’clock somewhere.” And the reason why
people believe they might be drunk is that many pagan groups, especially
mystery cults, used alcohol or other drugs in order to bring about ecstatic or
altered states, and so the disciples could certainly be mistaken for that. But
what I want to focus on today, at least to start, is the line that begins
today’s passage: “When the day of Pentecost had come, they were all together in
one place.” It’s not quite clear if this is just the disciples, including
Matthias who was just added to the 12, along with some of the women with them,
or the 120 who were followers at the time, although since they are in a house
together, it’s probably the smaller number. But there they are all together,
and of course this year at Pentecost we are not altogether. We’re not seeing
people in wearing red, or singing together the songs of the Spirit. But, like
the disciples we sit and wait.
At Easter I talked about living in a liminal time or a liminal space,
the in between between what was and what has not yet been. That’s where the
disciples found themselves after the crucifixion, in the in-between, and even
after they had encountered the risen Christ they were still really in that
liminal space because they didn’t know what was going to happen, where the
movement was going, what they were going to become. Instead they were still
receiving instructions from Jesus and he tells them to stay in Jerusalem, and
tells them that soon they will receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit, which
originally had been promised by John the Baptist, at that when the Spirit came
upon them they would receive power, and it’s a lot more fun to do that when you
can shout power back at me, and they would take that baptism of the Spirit and
the power they had received, they would be Jesus’ “witnesses in Jerusalem, in
all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.” And so they remain in
Jerusalem and are there for the festival of weeks, which was a spring harvest
festival that took place 50 days after Passover, and thus was also called
Pentecost, pente being 50. But here’s where things changed for them, and ended
their in-between time.
Showing posts with label acts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label acts. Show all posts
Monday, June 1, 2020
Heart of Power
Labels:
acts,
Black Lives Matter,
BLM,
Easter,
Holy Spirit,
joel,
language,
pentecost,
power,
Spirit
Monday, May 4, 2020
Heart of Generosity
Here is my sermon from Sunday. The text was Acts 2:42-47 and John 10:1-10
Normally when people hear this passage from Acts, or some later ones dealing with the same thing of the disciples and new converts sharing everything in common, they are sort of shocked. Some question whether that really happened, and if it did how it really worked. Some wonder why they stopped and why the church doesn’t call for the same thing today. And on the opposite of that, some wonder why they were promoting communism when clearly we need to value and support private property. And perhaps all of those questions are the right and the wrong questions to be asking. The fact is that we don’t know for sure that the early church practiced this in the form that Luke reports, or if he was embellishing a little. But, we do know that there were communities that lived communally. All indications are that the Qumran community, from which we get the Dead Sea scrolls, live communally.
So it’s still there, and yet this practice does not seem to have lasted for very long in the church, and maybe not outside of Jerusalem, as there is no indication in Paul’s letters of converts being called to this behavior. In fact, he chastises the Corinthian community for not sharing their food and drink when they gather together, which may have led to communion becoming separate from a communal meal. But, the fact that Luke, who is the writer of Acts, tells us several times that they were doing this, indicates that it was a fairly important practice, because in chapter 5 we are told the story of Ananias and Sapphira, who sell some property they own, but lie about how much they sell it for, keeping some of the money for themselves. And when they both lie about it, they both drop dead, pretty harsh penalty, but Peter says that in doing what they have done, they did not lie to them, but they lied to God. And so there you go.<
Normally when people hear this passage from Acts, or some later ones dealing with the same thing of the disciples and new converts sharing everything in common, they are sort of shocked. Some question whether that really happened, and if it did how it really worked. Some wonder why they stopped and why the church doesn’t call for the same thing today. And on the opposite of that, some wonder why they were promoting communism when clearly we need to value and support private property. And perhaps all of those questions are the right and the wrong questions to be asking. The fact is that we don’t know for sure that the early church practiced this in the form that Luke reports, or if he was embellishing a little. But, we do know that there were communities that lived communally. All indications are that the Qumran community, from which we get the Dead Sea scrolls, live communally.
So it’s still there, and yet this practice does not seem to have lasted for very long in the church, and maybe not outside of Jerusalem, as there is no indication in Paul’s letters of converts being called to this behavior. In fact, he chastises the Corinthian community for not sharing their food and drink when they gather together, which may have led to communion becoming separate from a communal meal. But, the fact that Luke, who is the writer of Acts, tells us several times that they were doing this, indicates that it was a fairly important practice, because in chapter 5 we are told the story of Ananias and Sapphira, who sell some property they own, but lie about how much they sell it for, keeping some of the money for themselves. And when they both lie about it, they both drop dead, pretty harsh penalty, but Peter says that in doing what they have done, they did not lie to them, but they lied to God. And so there you go.<
Monday, May 29, 2017
I've Got The Power
Here is my sermon from Sunday. The text was Acts 1:1-14:
I want you to imagine that you have found a ring that makes you invisible, no one can see you when you have it on. What would you do if you had such a ring? Think about that for a moment and then share with the person sitting next to you what you think you would do…. Now, that scenario is known as the Ring of Gyges, which comes to us from Plato’s Republic, in which a tale is told by Plato’s brother, Glaucon, of whether someone could actually be so virtuous as to not do something even if they knew they could get away with it. He argues that if we had the power of this ring that we would use it for our own benefit, just as the shepherd boy in the story who has found the ring does; using it to seduce the queen, kill the king and become king himself. If you have the power of the ring how could you not use it for your own benefit, or how could you not exercise the power that you have? I was a political science major in college, and I remember the first time encountering this story in a political philosophy class, but before we had read the Republic, the professor asked the same question I asked you. If you had the power of this ring, what would you do with it? My answer was that I would use it to travel the world without having to pay for it, not exactly honorable, but better than some of the other answers, but I still remember one of the women in the class who said that she would refuse to use the ring. She would not trust herself with it and so therefore wouldn’t give in to the temptations of its power. I remember being amazed at that answer, and perhaps she had already read the Republic, because that’s similar to what Socrates eventually says, which is that the person who uses the ring becomes not its master but its slave because they become entrapped by their own passions and appetites in the use of the ring, whereas the person who refuses to use the ring remains in control over their own lives, they retain their own power, and thus remain happy.
But is that our understanding of power? What does it mean to have power or to be powerful? One definition of power is the act of being able to do something, such as having the power of speech. A second definition, and one that is very important, is the ability to get extra base hits, that is the Yankees right fielder Aaron Judge hits for power. Third definition is the one most of us think of, and that is having the power, control or authority, and those are not the same things, over another in order to direct, coerce, influence or use force to get them to do something that you want or need them to do. But, there is another corollary to that, and that is having power not to be forced by another. So, for example, I have the power to tell members of the staff that they need to be at worship, and I have the power to enforce that statement. But while I may have the authority to say to all of you, you need to be at worship, I don’t have the power to enforce it, because you have the power to say “no” to me. So, we now have some understanding of what it means to have power, but what does it mean when we are told that when we receive the Holy Spirit that we will receive… power. Unfortunately, I can unequivocally say that that power is not the ability to get extra base hits, but what does that power actually look like in our lives? Is our power as Christians different from the power of the world? What does it mean to say we have the power of the Holy Spirit?
I want you to imagine that you have found a ring that makes you invisible, no one can see you when you have it on. What would you do if you had such a ring? Think about that for a moment and then share with the person sitting next to you what you think you would do…. Now, that scenario is known as the Ring of Gyges, which comes to us from Plato’s Republic, in which a tale is told by Plato’s brother, Glaucon, of whether someone could actually be so virtuous as to not do something even if they knew they could get away with it. He argues that if we had the power of this ring that we would use it for our own benefit, just as the shepherd boy in the story who has found the ring does; using it to seduce the queen, kill the king and become king himself. If you have the power of the ring how could you not use it for your own benefit, or how could you not exercise the power that you have? I was a political science major in college, and I remember the first time encountering this story in a political philosophy class, but before we had read the Republic, the professor asked the same question I asked you. If you had the power of this ring, what would you do with it? My answer was that I would use it to travel the world without having to pay for it, not exactly honorable, but better than some of the other answers, but I still remember one of the women in the class who said that she would refuse to use the ring. She would not trust herself with it and so therefore wouldn’t give in to the temptations of its power. I remember being amazed at that answer, and perhaps she had already read the Republic, because that’s similar to what Socrates eventually says, which is that the person who uses the ring becomes not its master but its slave because they become entrapped by their own passions and appetites in the use of the ring, whereas the person who refuses to use the ring remains in control over their own lives, they retain their own power, and thus remain happy.
But is that our understanding of power? What does it mean to have power or to be powerful? One definition of power is the act of being able to do something, such as having the power of speech. A second definition, and one that is very important, is the ability to get extra base hits, that is the Yankees right fielder Aaron Judge hits for power. Third definition is the one most of us think of, and that is having the power, control or authority, and those are not the same things, over another in order to direct, coerce, influence or use force to get them to do something that you want or need them to do. But, there is another corollary to that, and that is having power not to be forced by another. So, for example, I have the power to tell members of the staff that they need to be at worship, and I have the power to enforce that statement. But while I may have the authority to say to all of you, you need to be at worship, I don’t have the power to enforce it, because you have the power to say “no” to me. So, we now have some understanding of what it means to have power, but what does it mean when we are told that when we receive the Holy Spirit that we will receive… power. Unfortunately, I can unequivocally say that that power is not the ability to get extra base hits, but what does that power actually look like in our lives? Is our power as Christians different from the power of the world? What does it mean to say we have the power of the Holy Spirit?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


