Here is my sermon from Sunday. The text was Acts 1:1-14:
I
want you to imagine that you have found a ring that makes you invisible, no one
can see you when you have it on. What would you do if you had such a ring?
Think about that for a moment and then share with the person sitting next to
you what you think you would do…. Now,
that scenario is known as the Ring of Gyges, which comes to us from Plato’s
Republic, in which a tale is told by Plato’s brother, Glaucon, of whether
someone could actually be so virtuous as to not do something even if they knew
they could get away with it. He argues that if we had the power of this ring
that we would use it for our own benefit, just as the shepherd boy in the story
who has found the ring does; using it to seduce the queen, kill the king and
become king himself. If you have the power of the ring how could you not use it
for your own benefit, or how could you not exercise the power that you have? I
was a political science major in college, and I remember the first time
encountering this story in a political philosophy class, but before we had read
the Republic, the professor asked the same question I asked you. If you had the
power of this ring, what would you do with it? My answer was that I would use
it to travel the world without having to pay for it, not exactly honorable, but
better than some of the other answers, but I still remember one of the women in
the class who said that she would refuse to use the ring. She would not trust
herself with it and so therefore wouldn’t give in to the temptations of its power.
I remember being amazed at that answer, and perhaps she had already read the
Republic, because that’s similar to what Socrates eventually says, which is
that the person who uses the ring becomes not its master but its slave because
they become entrapped by their own passions and appetites in the use of the
ring, whereas the person who refuses to use the ring remains in control over
their own lives, they retain their own power, and thus remain happy.
But
is that our understanding of power? What does it mean to have power or to be
powerful? One definition of power is the act of being able to do something,
such as having the power of speech. A second definition, and one that is very
important, is the ability to get extra base hits, that is the Yankees right
fielder Aaron Judge hits for power. Third definition is the one most of us
think of, and that is having the power, control or authority, and those are not
the same things, over another in order to direct, coerce, influence or use
force to get them to do something that you want or need them to do. But, there
is another corollary to that, and that is having power not to be forced by
another. So, for example, I have the power to tell members of the staff that
they need to be at worship, and I have the power to enforce that statement. But
while I may have the authority to say to all of you, you need to be at worship,
I don’t have the power to enforce it, because you have the power to say “no” to
me. So, we now have some understanding of what it means to have power, but what
does it mean when we are told that when we receive the Holy Spirit that we will
receive… power. Unfortunately, I can unequivocally say that that power is not
the ability to get extra base hits, but what does that power actually look like
in our lives? Is our power as Christians different from the power of the world?
What does it mean to say we have the power of the Holy Spirit?
